Human-verified evidence, or nothing
AnswerLift is an evidence ledger for AI answer visibility. Scheduled collection asks your prompts through the Perplexity Sonar API and the OpenAI Responses API with web search, storing each answer verbatim with its cited sources, its model and its timestamp. Your team adds what it observed by hand in the consumer interfaces. Then a second person verifies every record — collected or hand-entered — before it can appear in a client report.
No estimated scores, anywhere. Collection runs only through official paid APIs, never by scraping a consumer interface, and every record says which provider and model produced it. Where collection is off, the product says so instead of substituting a guess.
The client report · illustrative content
Verified evidence only — the gate is in the query, not the layout
Verified observations
2 across 2 prompts
No score. No estimate.
Which vendors handle multi-site rollouts for mid-market retail?
Observed 12 March, 09:24 · Answer export — full transcript saved
Named in the shortlist paragraph, but the answer cited two directory pages and no page on the brand's own domain.
Verified by R.O.
Is [brand] a good fit for a 40-store estate?
Observed 12 March, 10:05 · Answer export — source list captured
Pricing page cited as source 3 of 6. The answer quoted an out-of-date figure, so a correction task is linked to this record.
Verified by R.O.
Records still awaiting review are excluded from this report by the data query itself, so an unverified observation cannot reach a client screen. Records reach the ledger two ways — collected through a paid provider API, or captured by hand in a consumer interface — and both are labelled with which.
The differentiator
Every observation — whether a person typed it or a provider API returned it — starts life pending. A person reviews it against the stored answer text, puts their name to it, and marks it verified or needs-review. Only verified records are returned to the client report, and the exclusion is enforced in the data query, so an unverified record cannot reach a client screen even if someone rewrote the page.
Ask the same question again next month and it is stored as v2 of that prompt, alongside v1. Nothing overwrites, nothing is inferred, and a QA decision never rewrites the snapshot it was made about.
Recorded
Prompt, engine or provider model, cited sources, capture time, observation time
Classified
Cited · mentioned but not cited · not mentioned, plus confidence and volatility
Signed off
Named reviewer, review timestamp, and only then client-visible
What the software will not do
Choose the next right step
Available now
Share the visibility question. We manually review the fit and follow up with a recommended path.
Request SnapshotAvailable now · $3,500 one-time
Start a focused engagement to structure the evidence, priorities, handoff, and practical next actions.
See Sprint scopeSales-led rollout
For agencies planning a multi-client operating model. Access and scope are discussed with the team.
Discuss rolloutBuilt for agency handoffs
Evidence is more useful when it carries scope, uncertainty, ownership, and review status with it—not when it is trapped in another dashboard.
Explore the product workflowScopes the prompts, markets, and client questions worth observing.
Receives an assigned remediation brief with the evidence and approval context attached.
Can explain what was observed, what is still uncertain, and what happens next.
Receives a client-safe report containing only human-verified observations.
Straight answers